Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

Core Citations

---

APPLIES

• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.

FOLLOWS

• Sabaf SpA v MFI Furniture Centres Ltd
• Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v Pike Signals Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977 - Articles : S-2
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• Novartis v Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd

[See more]

• Cipla Ltd v Glaxo Group Ltd

DISTINGUISHES

• SmithKline Beecham Plc's (Paroxetine Anhydrate) Patent

REFERS TO

• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd

[See more]

• Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV
• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Inc.
• Yissum Research and Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem v Comptroller-General of Patents
• Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Evysio Medical Devices ULC
• Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation
• Smithkline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (Costs) (No.2)
• Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Clayton (No.2)
• Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (No 2)
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Richardson-Vicks Inc.; Smith Kline Beecham v Richardson-Vicks Inc.
• Draco AB's SPC Application

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2009 RPC 4
• [2009] FSR 9
• [2008] LS Law Pat 67

CONSIDERED in

• Saertex France Sas v Hexcel Reinforcements UK Ltd (formerly Formax (UK) Ltd)
• HTC Europe Company Ltd v Apple Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of the State of California)
• Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Wyeth LLC

[See more]

• Gareth Kevin Glass and Others v freyssinet Ltd
• H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)
• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others

REFERRED in

• Sony Communications International AB v SSH Communications Security Corporation

CITED in

• Brigade (BBS-TEK) Ltd v Amber Valley Ltd
• Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Others
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)

This document cites

---

• Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Inc.
• Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Clayton (No.2)
• Cipla Ltd v Glaxo Group Ltd
• Yissum Research and Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem v Comptroller-General of Patents
• Smithkline Beecham Plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (Costs) (No.2)



See all quotations

• SmithKline Beecham Plc's (Paroxetine Anhydrate) Patent
• Pozzoli v BDMO
• Novartis v Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
• Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Evysio Medical Devices ULC
• Re Raychem Corporation's Patents
• Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (No 2)
• Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation
• Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Richardson-Vicks Inc.; Smith Kline Beecham v Richardson-Vicks Inc.
• Bonzel v Intervention Ltd
• Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV
• Beloit Technology Inc. v Valmet Paper Machinery Ltd
• Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v Pike Signals Ltd
• Draco AB's SPC Application
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• Sabaf SpA v MFI Furniture Centres Ltd