Browning v War Office
Linked as:
Extract
Browning v War Office
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Peacock v Amusement Equip. Company Ltd
- Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
- Redpath v Belfast and County Down Railway
[See more]
DOES NOT FOLLOW
APPLIES
CITES
- Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District v Croydon Corporation ; Monmouthshire County Council v Smith
- Peacock v Amusement Equip. Company Ltd
CONSIDERS
- Bradburn v The Great Western Railway Company
- Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948 - Articles : S-2
REFERRED in
APPLIED in
CONSIDERED in
- John Coleridge Turner (Plaintiff Respondent) Ministry of Defence (Defendant Appellant)
- Anthanasopoulos v Moseley
- Pugliese v Chartwell,
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Mohamed Yusof v Tin Huck and Another
- Jeremy Chong Hoe Siong; Khoo Ih Chu
- Mohamed Yusof; Ti Huck and Another
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
NOT FOLLOWED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
This document cites
- British Transport Commission v Gourley
- Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hambrook
- Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District v Croydon Corporation ; Monmouthshire County Council v Smith
- Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
- Betty's Cafés Ltd v Phillips Furnishing Stores Ltd