R v Hancock

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R v Hancock

DISAPPROVES

• R v Moloney

CITES

• DPP v Smith

APPLIES

• R v Barr

CITED in

• Powell and another v Boldaz and Others
• Boughey v R
• Powell v Boladz

[See more]

• Gederon (Ronald) v R
• Tench v R
• Cadogan (Tyrone) v R (No 1)
• Rabindra Deo v The State
• R v Woollin
• Shonovia Thomas Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• R v Gnango
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)
• Margaret Gardner v Rivington Gardner

CONSIDERED in

• R v Robert Michael Fallon
• Kenny Charlie v The Queen
• R v Andrew David Russell

[See more]

• Layean Atkinson and R
• R v Dennis Francis Hayes
• Robert Clifford Barrett v The Queen
• R v Grant
• R v Jones (Ivor)
• Collins (Devon) v R
• Weekes et Al v The Queen
• Tench v R
• Ross v The Queen
• Gederon v R
• The Director of Public Prosecutions v Shannon Wilson aka Ramon Wilson
• Cadogan v R
• Deo v The State
• The People (at the Suit of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v M.B
• SZTAL(Appellant) v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor
• R v Woollin
• Ronald Gederon Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• [1]Henry Weekes [2] Everette Crump [3] Kenaz Whyte [4] Paul Ephraim [5] Kester Bailey [6] Dale Christian Appellants v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Orosco v The State
• R v Jeli Ogunbowale
• R v Scarlett
• R v Jogee
• R v Simon Lee Hawkins
• R v Powell (Anthony Glassford); R v English (Philip); R v Daniels (Antonio Eval)

APPLIED in

• Frankland v The Queen
• R v Walker and another
• R v Nedrick

[See more]

• R v Barr
• R v Ward

REFERRED in

• Attorney-General v News Group Newspapers Plc
• The People (at the Suit of the Director of Public Prosecutions) v M.B
• Lennie Ross Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

[See more]

• Eustace Armstrong Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• R v Slack
• R v Jogee

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1986) 67 NR 171
• 82 CrAppR 264
• [1986] 1 All ER 641

[See more]

• [1986] 2 WLR 357
• [1986] AC 455

This document cites

• R v Moloney
• R v Barr
• DPP v Smith