Re L (Grave risk of harm)(Child's Objections)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• IB v MM
• Re F (Children) (Wrongful Retention: Child's Objections)

REFERS TO

• Re S (A Child) (Habitual Residence and Child's Objections) (Brazil)
• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re
• Re M (Abduction: Zimbabwe)

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Re T (Abduction: Child's Objections to Return)

APPLIES

• Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children as Parties to Appeal)
• Re J (A Child) (Custody rights; Jurisdiction)

CITES

• S v C

CONSIDERS

• Re F (A Child)
• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• Re W (Minors)

[See more]

• E (Children) (FC)
• LC (Children)
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985

DISTINGUISHES

• WF v FJ, BF and RF (Abduction: Child's Objection)
• Re H (Abduction)

This document cites

• M and another (Children) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) Re
• D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody); Re
• Re T (Abduction: Child's Objections to Return)
• Re J (A Child) (Custody rights; Jurisdiction)
• Re S (A Child) (Habitual Residence and Child's Objections) (Brazil)



See all quotations

• IB v MM
• Re F (A Child)
• Re W (Minors)
• Re M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children as Parties to Appeal)
• S v C
• WF v FJ, BF and RF (Abduction: Child's Objection)
• Re F (Children) (Wrongful Retention: Child's Objections)
• Re M (Abduction: Zimbabwe)
• Re H (Abduction)
• Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985
• LC (Children)
• E (Children) (FC)
• Jasna Detiček v Maurizio Sgueglia.
• Doris Povse v Mauro Alpago.
• Convention on the Rights of the Child