R v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ex parte Kay and Company ; R v Same, ex parte Rayner and Keeler ; R v Same, ex parte Allied Domecq Plc ; R v Same, ex parte the Wardens and Commonality of the Mystery of Mercers of the City of London ; R v Same, ex parte Colaingrove Ltd ; R v Same, ex parte Greenlee Group Plc ; R v Same, ex parte National Provident Institution ; R v Same ex parte Association of Optometrists
Linked as:
Extract
R v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ex parte Kay and Company ; R v Same, ex parte Rayner and Keeler ; R v Same, ex parte Allied Domecq Plc ; R v Same, ex parte the Wardens and Commonality of the Mystery of Mercers of the City of London ; R v Same, ex parte Colaingrove Ltd ; R v Same, ex parte Greenlee Group Plc ; R v Same, ex parte National Provident Institution ; R v Same ex parte Association of Optometrists
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CITES
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte MFK Underwriting Agencies Ltd and Others and related applications
- Huntly (Marchioness) v Gaskell
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Arnold
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Value Added Tax Act 1994
- Congreve v Home Office
- R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Unilever Plc and Another
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Mills v Cooper
- President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation (Lips)
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- R Stephen Jackley and Kramer Craft v Secretary of State for Justice
- PML Accounting Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
REFERRED in
- Marks & Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 1, No 3 and Case C-62/00)
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v DFS Furniture Company Ltd (No 2)
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
