Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs
Linked as:
Extract
Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- British Telecommunications Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Card Protection Plan Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
[See more]
REFERS TO
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Wellington Private Hospital Ltd
- College of Estate Management v HM Revenue and Customs
- Appleby Bowers v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
[See more]
APPLIES
CONSIDERS
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v FDR Ltd
- Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : S-1
- Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : S-4
[See more]
CITED in
- Honourable Society of Middle Temple v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Grimsby College Enterprises Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Finnamore (t/a Hanbidge Storage Services)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v UK Storage Company (SW) Ltd
- Holland andaanother v HM Revenue and Customs
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
- The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs v Gray & Farrar International LLP
- Tumble Tots (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
- HM Revenue and Customs v Denyer
[See more]
APPLIED in
This document cites
- British Telecommunications Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Moyna v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Card Protection Plan Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Wellington Private Hospital Ltd
