Honourable Society of Middle Temple v Revenue and Customs Commissioners

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

CITES

• Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2013] STC 1998
• [2013] BVC 1690

CITED in

• Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Finnamore (t/a Hanbidge Storage Services)
• TC03645: Itchen Sash Window Renovation Ltd
• Wiltonpark Ltd and Others v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs

CONSIDERED in

• Revenue Commissioners v Covidien Ltd

This document cites

• Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs
• The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple
• Value Added Tax Act 1994
• Beynon and Partners v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
• European Commission v French Republic.



See all quotations

• Commissioners of Customs & Excise v Primback Ltd.
• Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze v Part Service Srl.
• BGŻ Leasing sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie.
• Finanzamt Frankfurt am Main V-Höchst v Deutsche Bank AG.
• European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.
• Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group plc.
• Levob Verzekeringen BV and OV Bank NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.
• Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.
• Christiane Adam, épouse Urbing v Administration de l'enregistrement et des domaines.
• Faaborg-Gelting Linien A/S v Finanzamt Flensburg.
• RLRE Tellmer Property sro v Finanční ředitelství v Ústí nad Labem.
• Commission of the European Communities v French Republic.
• Card Protection Plan Ltd (CPP) v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.