HM Revenue and Customs v Denyer

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Tumble Tots (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs

REFERS TO

• Sinclair Collis Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Case C-275/01)
• Executors of MJ Taylor and Mrs Pauline Taylor (t/a Anglian Markets & Bantees LON/99/1240)
• Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs

RESUELVE RECURSO

• HM Revenue and Customs v Denyer

REVERSES

• HM Revenue and Customs v Denyer

CONSIDERS

• Value Added Tax Act 1994 - Articles : SCH-9

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] STC 633
• [2008] BTC 5574
• [2008] BVC 4078-5

[See more]

• [2008] 05 EG 168

CONSIDERED in

• Holland andaanother v HM Revenue and Customs

This document cites

• Tumble Tots (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
• Byrom and Others (trading as Salon 24) v HM Revenue and Customs
• Sinclair Collis Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Case C-275/01)
• HM Revenue and Customs v Denyer
• Executors of MJ Taylor and Mrs Pauline Taylor (t/a Anglian Markets & Bantees LON/99/1240)



See all quotations

• Value Added Tax Act 1994
• Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Coffeeshop "Siberië" vof.
• Sinclair Collis Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.
• Belgian State v Temco Europe SA.