Richards v Richards

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Samson v Samson

CONSIDERS

• Re McGrath (Infants)
• Tarr v Tarr

REFERS TO

• Walker v Walker
• Silverstone v Silverstone
• Gurasz v Gurasz

[See more]

• Tarr v Tarr
• Bassett v Bassett
• Re Thain. Thain v Taylor
• North London Railway Company v Great Northern Railway Company
• Re McGrath (Infants)
• Montgomery v Montgomery

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Richards v Richards

APPLIES

• Re O'Hara

CITES

• Phillips v Phillips
• Davis (A.P.) (Respondent) v Johnson (A.P.) (Appellant)
• Stewart v Stewart

[See more]

• Re Agar-Ellis. Agar-Ellis v Lascelles
• Adams v Adams

REVERSES

• Richards v Richards

RELIES UPON

• Spindlow v Spindlow

CONSIDERS

• Elsworth v Elsworth
• Myers v Myers
• J v C

[See more]

• Guardianship of Minors Act 1971 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Homes Act 1967 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-38
• Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-37
• Employment Rights Act 1996
• Matrimonial Homes Act 1967
• Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976 - Articles : S-3
• Rent Act 1968
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Guardianship of Minors Act 1971
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976 - Articles : S-1
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1925 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-45
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978 - Articles : S-16
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978 - Articles : S-15
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1886
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978 - Articles : S-36
• Children Act 1975 - Articles : S-86
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-41
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 - Articles : S-25
• Matrimonial Homes and Property Act 1981 - Articles : S-1
• Housing Act 1980
• County Courts Act 1959 - Articles : S-74

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1983] UKHL J0630-1
• [1984] FLR 11
• [1983] 147 JP 481

[See more]

• [1983] 3 WLR 173
• [1984] AC 174

CITED in

• M v M (Custody of Children)
• M v State Hospitals Board for Scotland
• Lorna Paton Applicant v Ulmer Everton Paton Respondent [ECSC]

[See more]

• Scott v Scott
• AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC

CONSIDERED in

• Re "P"(A Minor)
• Re M (Minors)
• Pauline Theresa Delaney v Patrick Anthony McGovern

[See more]

• Violet Icilda Reid (Petitioner v Soriley Emmanuel Reid (Respondent
• Sylvia Joan Stapleton v Michael Edward Stapleton
• Alison Dawe Appellant) v Colin George Edwards Respondent)
• Re D (Prohibited Steps Order)
• Shipp v Shipp
• M v M (Custody Application)
• Eileen Theresa Power (Petitioner v James Joseph Power (Respondent
• Khan v Khan
• Rule v Rule
• Ruth Mary Rameswari v Roland Oswald Rameswari
• Re W and W (Interim Custody)
• Re "W" Minors
• Vikki Tracey Holmes v Craig Creighton Clarke
• Philip Andrew Wright (Respondent (Petitioner) v Jane Sheridan Wright (Appellant
• Thoirs v Thoirs
• Re T (A Minor: Wardship) T v T (Ouster Order)
• Marianne Jayne Elizabeth Kathleen Stephenson v Stephen David Paul Stephenson (Defendant/Applicant)
• Jill Rogers (Petitioner) Respondent) v Ronald Robert Victor Rogers (Respondent
• Angela Preece v Richard Charles Preece
• Jill Frances Davies v Stephen Davies
• Andrea Michelle Dare v Lyndon Phillip Dare
• Valerie Rose Simmons (Applicant v Claudius Alexander (Respondent
• Kalsi v Kalsi
• "S" (A Minor) and and Others
• Michelle Erica Campbell v Cameron Eustace Campbell
• Manjit Jassi (Appellant (Petitioner) v Rooplal Jassi (Respondent
• Scott v Scott
• Michelle Erica Campbell v Cameron Eustace Campbell
• Michelle Erica Campbell (Nee King) v Cameron Eustace Campbell
• Hilary Ann Gibbs (Respondent (Petitioner) v Malcolm John Gibbs (Appellant
• Phyllis Shand-Cummings v Tago Cummings
• King v King
• Re D (A Minor) (Adoption Order: Validity)
• Kanhai v Kanhai
• Gibson v Austin
• Blackstock v Blackstock
• B v IB
• Lucas v Lucas
• C v C and Anor
• Re X (A Child); Re Y (A Child)
• Re JM (A Child)
• Galan v Galan
• Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council v AM
• Re Z (A Minor) (Freedom of Publication)
• Brown v Brown

REFERRED in

• Health Service Executive of Ireland v Z
• Virginia Joseph Petitioner v Julian Joseph Respondent [ECSC]
• O'B v O'B

[See more]

• Sherla King Nee James Plaintiff v Fitzroy King Defendant [ECSC]
• Re NY (A Child) (1980 Hague Abduction Convention) (Inherent Jurisdiction)

FOLLOWED in

• Summers v Summers
• Thurley v Smith
• Lee v Lee

DISTINGUISHED in

• Lim Tiong Sin; Tan Boon Lang

APPLIED in

• Wiseman v Simpson
• Ainsbury v Millington

ADOPTED in

• Pinson (Née Nichols) v Pinson

This document cites

---

• Gurasz v Gurasz
• Bassett v Bassett
• Phillips v Phillips
• Spindlow v Spindlow
• Tarr v Tarr



See all quotations

• Myers v Myers
• Tarr v Tarr
• Davis (A.P.) (Respondent) v Johnson (A.P.) (Appellant)
• Elsworth v Elsworth
• Samson v Samson
• Richards v Richards
• J v C
• Re McGrath (Infants)
• Re Thain. Thain v Taylor
• Re McGrath (Infants)
• North London Railway Company v Great Northern Railway Company
• Montgomery v Montgomery
• Adams v Adams
• Re O'Hara
• Walker v Walker
• Silverstone v Silverstone
• Re Agar-Ellis. Agar-Ellis v Lascelles
• Stewart v Stewart
• Guardianship of Minors Act 1971
• Matrimonial Homes Act 1967
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Domestic Proceedings and Magistrates' Courts Act 1978
• Employment Rights Act 1996
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1925
• County Courts Act 1959
• Matrimonial Homes and Property Act 1981
• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925
• Housing Act 1980
• Guardianship of Infants Act 1886
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981