Alastair Brett v The Solicitors Regulation Authority

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall

REFERS TO

• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons

CITES

• Napier and Another v Pressdram Ltd
• Salsbury v Law Society
• Medcalf v Mardell (Wasted Costs Order)

[See more]

• Katherine Jane Lumsdon and Others v Legal Services Board General Council of the Bar (acting by the Bar Standards Board) and Others (Interested Parties)
• Langford v The Law Society
• Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Watson v Watson (Wasted Costs Orders)

CONSIDERS

• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-49
• Computer Misuse Act 1990
• Solicitors Act 1974 - Articles : S-46

[See more]

• Computer Misuse Act 1990 - Articles : S-1
• Legal Services Act 2007 - Articles : S-188

CONSIDERED in

• The Council of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory v Davey
• Richard Charles Prescott v Solicitors Regulation Authority
• Ellis v Solicitors Regulation Authority

[See more]

• The Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory(Plaintiff) v Alan Charles Powrie
• Andrew William Shaw v Solicitors Regulation Authority

CITED in

• Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2015] PNLR 2

REFERRED in

• David Fenton Wingate v The Solicitors Regulation Authority

This document cites

• Langford v The Law Society
• Napier and Another v Pressdram Ltd
• Salsbury v Law Society
• Medcalf v Mardell (Wasted Costs Order)
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons



See all quotations

• Katherine Jane Lumsdon and Others v Legal Services Board General Council of the Bar (acting by the Bar Standards Board) and Others (Interested Parties)
• Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Watson v Watson (Wasted Costs Orders)
• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall
• Solicitors Act 1974
• Computer Misuse Act 1990
• R v G; R v R