R v G; R v R
Linked as:
Extract
R v G; R v R
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
CONSIDERS
- Criminal Damage Act 1971 - Articles : S-1
- Malicious Damage Act 1861 - Articles : S-51
- Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - Articles : S-23
[See more]
FOLLOWS
RESUELVE RECURSO
REVERSES
REFERRED in
- Pinkney v Director of Public Prosecutions
- Chief Constable, Tayside Police v Basterfield
- The Financial Conduct Authority v Avacade Ltd ((in Liquidation)) (Trading as Avacade Investment Options)
[See more]
CITED in
- Torreblanca-White v Crown Prosecution Service
- Brown v R
- Malik Mohammed Nazeer v Solicitors Regulation Authority
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2019
- R HC (a child, by his litigation friend CC) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (1st Defendant) The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2nd Defendant)
- Mead v Allianz Australia Ltd
[See more]
APPLIED in
FOLLOWED in
- Madhavan Peter v PP
- Booth v DPP
- Jersey Financial Services Commission v Alternate Insurance Services Ltd, Clark and Le Fustec
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPROVED in
RELIED UPON in
This document cites
- R v Martin (Colin)
- R v Miller
- R v Bowen
- (1) Oakscope Ltd (formerly Pollyway Nominees Ltd) and ABAGROVE PROPERTY Company Ltd and CHASRA Investment Company Ltd and CLIFFEHAM Ltd and CRANEHill ESTATES Ltd and ESRA Investments Ltd and HALYDENE Ltd and PANOLA PROPERTY Company Ltd and POLLYWay Ltd and SUEGAN Ltd and TOPBorough ESTATES Ltd and UNISTATES Ltd (each (in Liquidation) and suing by their Liquidator; Paresh Shah) v HSBC London Ltd and The HONG KONG and SHANGHAI BankING Corporation Ltd
- R v G; R v R