9 Cal.4th 161, S036526, Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 9 Cal.4th 161, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 521, 885 P.2d 934

Opinion Judge: [12] Baxter

Party Name: Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Kamine, Steiner & Ungerer, Bernard S. Kamine and Phyllis M. Ungerer for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Pedro B. Echeverria, John F. Haggerty and Christopher M. Westhoff, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Louise H. Renne, City Attorney (San...

Case Date: December 28, 1994

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

9 Cal.4th 161, S036526, Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 813 F.2d 922 (9th Cir. 1987), 85-2420, Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco
Federal Cases - 36 F.3d 1513 (10th Cir. 1994), 93-1095, Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver
Federal Cases - 637 F.Supp. 843 (D.Kan. 1986), Civ. A. 86-2226, Gilbert Cent. Corp. v. Kemp
Federal Cases - 488 U.S. 469 (1989), 87-998, City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
Federal Cases - 429 U.S. 252 (1977), 75-616, Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan

See all quotations