206 Cal.App.3d 449, D006857, Konica Business Machines U. Inc. v. Regents of University of California

Citation: 206 Cal.App.3d 449, 253 Cal.Rptr. 591

Opinion Judge: [11] Work

Party Name: Konica Business Machines U. Inc. v. Regents of University of California

Attorney: [7] Cutler & Cutler and Paul R. Salerno for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] James E. Holst, Gary Morrison, Susan Amateau and David A. Dorinson for Defendants and Respondents. [9] Shenas, Shaw & Spievak, Peter Shenas and Douglas S. Waggaman for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday November 23, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

206 Cal.App.3d 449, D006857, Konica Business Machines U. Inc. v. Regents of University of California

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 20 Cal.2d 83, 16023, Miller v. Mckinnon
California - 208 Cal.App.2d 803, 20694, Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior Court In and For City and County of San Francisco
California - 195 Cal.App.3d 1331, D005215, Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Bd. of Education
Florida - 352 So.2d 1190 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1977), 76-1708, Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral
Massachusetts - 353 Mass. 503 (1968), Gil-Bern Const. Corp. v. City of Brockton

See all quotations