2 Cal.4th 556, S021885, Burden v. Snowden

Citation: 2 Cal.4th 556, 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 531, 828 P.2d 672

Opinion Judge: [11] Baxter

Party Name: Burden v. Snowden

Attorney: [7] Thomas Kathe, City Attorney, Filarsky & Watt, Steve A. Filarsky, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Amy D. Hogue and Kevin M. Fong for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Mayer & Reeves, Thomas M. Reeves, Irving Berger, Martin J. Mayer, Whitmore, Johnson & Bolanos, Richard S. Whitmore, Craig W. Patenaude...

Case Date: April 30, 1992

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

2 Cal.4th 556, S021885, Burden v. Snowden

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 25 Cal.3d 772, 23830, Hays v. Wood
California - 28 Cal.3d 692, 31283, California Teachers Assn. v. San Diego Community College Dist.
California - 32 Cal.3d 128, 31533, Baggett v. Gates
California - 33 Cal.3d 211, 31532, Tiernan v. Trustees of Cal. State University & Colleges
California - 51 Cal.3d 202, S007828, Kimmel v. Goland

See all quotations