215 Cal.App.3d 438, A042059, Hock Investment Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 215 Cal.App.3d 438, 263 Cal.Rptr. 665

Opinion Judge: [10] Kline

Party Name: Hock Investment Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Peter G. Hanson, James M. Wagstaffe, Kaus & Kerr and Kaus, Kerr & Wagstaffe for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, and Andrew W. Schwartz, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Friday September 22, 1989

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

215 Cal.App.3d 438, A042059, Hock Investment Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 659 F.Supp. 1012 (N.D.Cal. 1984), C 83-5640, Traweek v. City and County of San Francisco
California - 30 Cal.2d 817, 19546, County of San Diego v. Cal. Water Etc. Co.
California - 2 Cal.3d 493, 29683, Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.
California - 22 Cal.3d 644, 30868, Youngblood v. Board of Supervisors
California - 35 Cal.3d 858, 31615, Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board

See all quotations