181 Cal.App.3d 1085, AO22633, City and County of San Francisco v. Grant Co.

Citation: 181 Cal.App.3d 1085, 227 Cal.Rptr. 154

Opinion Judge: [11] Smith

Party Name: City and County of San Francisco v. Grant Co.

Attorney: [7] Richard N. Rapoport, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy and Rudy, Rapoport & Halden for Defendants and Appellants. [8] George Agnost, City Attorney, and Robin Reitzes Manion, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent. [9] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Thomas E. Warriner...

Case Date: Tuesday May 20, 1986

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

181 Cal.App.3d 1085, AO22633, City and County of San Francisco v. Grant Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 30 Cal.2d 817, 19546, County of San Diego v. Cal. Water Etc. Co.
California - 40 Cal.2d 852, 22217, In re L. A. County Pioneer Society
California - 59 Cal.2d 382, 26280, Lerner v. Los Angeles City Bd. of Ed.
California - 67 Cal.2d 297, 28479, Driscoll v. City of Los Angeles
California - 15 Cal.3d 720, 23279, Strong v. County of Santa Cruz

See all quotations