68 Cal.App.3d 965, 15902, Raley v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Citation: 68 Cal.App.3d 965, 137 Cal.Rptr. 699

Opinion Judge: [11] Friedman

Party Name: Raley v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Attorney: [7] Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, Robert R. Harlan and James M. Day, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent. [8] Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Carl Boronkay and R. H. Connett, Assistant Attorneys General, and E. Robert Wright, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants. [9] Harry...

Case Date: April 07, 1977

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

68 Cal.App.3d 965, 15902, Raley v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 507 F.2d 517 (9th Cir. 1974), 73-3611, League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Federal Cases - 516 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1975), 74-2546, People of State of Cal. ex rel. Younger v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
California - 59 Cal.2d 382, 26280, Lerner v. Los Angeles City Bd. of Ed.
California - 66 Cal.2d 34, 21914, Russian Hill Imp. Ass'n v. Board of Permit Appeals of City and County of San Francisco
California - 8 Cal.2d 444, 16082, Whitten v. California State Board, Etc.

See all quotations