16 Cal.App.4th 1005, A057840, City of Lafayette v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

Citation: 16 Cal.App.4th 1005, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 658

Opinion Judge: [12] Newsom

Party Name: City of Lafayette v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

Attorney: [7] Robert B. Maddow, Verna P. Bromley, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson & Falk, Peter J. Busch, Ethan P. Schulman and Anne E. Mudge for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Weissburg & Aronson and Gregory V. Moser as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants. [9] Williams & Woods,...

Case Date: June 23, 1993

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

16 Cal.App.4th 1005, A057840, City of Lafayette v. East Bay Mun. Utility Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 909 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1990), 88-6355, Retirement Fund Trust of Plumbing v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California - 47 Cal.2d 177, 24244, Hall v. City of Taft
California - 14 Cal.3d 831, 30405, Estate of McDill
California - 28 Cal.3d 692, 31283, California Teachers Assn. v. San Diego Community College Dist.
California - 42 Cal.3d 891, 24837, People v. Overstreet

See all quotations