47 Cal.2d 177, 24244, Hall v. City of Taft

Citation: 47 Cal.2d 177, 302 P.2d 574

Opinion Judge: [11] Carter

Party Name: Hall v. City of Taft

Attorney: [7] Henry G. Baron, City Attorney, and Allen Grimes for Appellants. [8] Mack, Bianco, King & Eyherabide and Dominic Bianco for Respondent. [9] Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Richard H. Perry, Deputy Attorney General, Johnson & Stanton, Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., as Amici Cur...

Case Date: Friday October 19, 1956

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

47 Cal.2d 177, 24244, Hall v. City of Taft

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 134 Cal. 592, Sac. 850, Gridley School Dist. v. Stout
California - 156 Cal. 416, L. A. 2,296, Pass School Dist. of Los Angeles County v. Hollywood City School Dist. of Los Angeles County
California - 166 Cal. 7, L. A. 3425, Pasadena School District v. City of Pasadena
California - 173 Cal. 154, S. F. 6988, Worthington School District v. Eureka School District
California - 183 Cal. 636, Crim. 2261, Ex parte Daniels

See all quotations