22 Cal.App.3d 152, 28819, City of Santa Clara v. Santa Clara Unified Sch. Dist.

Citation: 22 Cal.App.3d 152, 99 Cal.Rptr. 212

Opinion Judge: [10] Rouse

Party Name: City of Santa Clara v. Santa Clara Unified Sch. Dist.

Attorney: [7] William M. Siegel, County Counsel, and Robert T. Owens, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Edwin J. Moore, City Attorney, and M. Van Smith, Assistant City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: December 20, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

22 Cal.App.3d 152, 28819, City of Santa Clara v. Santa Clara Unified Sch. Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 23 Cal.2d 632, 5620, Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 47 Cal.2d 177, 24244, Hall v. City of Taft
California - 51 Cal.2d 675, 24893, Watenpaugh v. State Teachers' Retirement
California - 159 Cal.App.2d 417, 18064, Town of Atherton v. Superior Court
California - 170 Cal.App.2d 619, 5917, Tustin Heights Assn. v. Bd. of Supervisors

See all quotations