15 Cal.App.3d 656, 26297, Burlingame Motor Co. v. Peninsula Activities, Inc.

Citation: 15 Cal.App.3d 656, 93 Cal.Rptr. 376

Opinion Judge: [10] Devine

Party Name: Burlingame Motor Co. v. Peninsula Activities, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Maloney, Chase, Fisher & Hurst and Harold J. Chase for Cross-complainant and Appellant. [8] Hanna & Brophy, Donald R. Brophy, Channell, McNamara & Lewis, William R. Channell and Richard G. Logan for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: February 26, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

15 Cal.App.3d 656, 26297, Burlingame Motor Co. v. Peninsula Activities, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.
California - 54 Cal.2d 445, 25375, Harvey Mach. Co. v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.
California - 58 Cal.2d 601, 26913, Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co.
California - 62 Cal.2d 40, 21291, Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Elec. Corp.
California - 66 Cal.2d 951, 7797, Markley v. Beagle

See all quotations