52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.

Citation: 52 Cal.2d 411, 340 P.2d 604

Opinion Judge: [10] Shenk

Party Name: Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.

Attorney: [7] E. D. Yeomans, Edward A. Hume and James W. O'Brien for Appellant. [8] Thielen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, James W. Baldwin, Ernest R. Baldwin, Callaway, Kirtland & Packard and Wallace C. Reed for Respondent.

Case Date: Friday June 26, 1959

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

52 Cal.2d 411, 25377, Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 126 F.Supp. 406 (N.D.Cal. 1954), 33585, Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott Corp.
California - 110 Cal.App.2d 128, 14861, Butt v. Bertola
California - 122 Cal.App.2d 264, 15517, Barkett v. Brucato
California - 125 Cal.App.2d 578, 19612, Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.
California - 131 Cal.App.2d 85, 20738, Sproul v. Cuddy

See all quotations