10 Cal.3d 874, 23020, Whitfield v. Roth

Citation: 10 Cal.3d 874, 112 Cal.Rptr. 540, 519 P.2d 588

Opinion Judge: [12] Sullivan

Party Name: Whitfield v. Roth

Attorney: [7] Gonick, Schmid & Bernstein, Harry Gonick, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, P. M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Albert E. Levy, Ralph Golub and M. Reed Hunter for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Fadem & Kanner and Gideon Kanner as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. [9] Burnhill...

Case Date: Tuesday March 12, 1974

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

10 Cal.3d 874, 23020, Whitfield v. Roth

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 151 Cal. 1, L. A. 1656, Tingley v. Times Mirror Company, (A Corporation)
California - 21 Cal.2d 329, 18179, Artukovich v. Astendorf
California - 46 Cal.2d 818, 5813, People v. Watson
California - 61 Cal.2d 602, 27850, Horn v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.
California - 65 Cal.2d 549, 22430, Hoffman v. Brandt

See all quotations