66 Cal.2d 468, 29026, Tammen v. San Diego County

Citation: 66 Cal.2d 468, 58 Cal.Rptr. 249, 426 P.2d 753

Opinion Judge: [10] Mccomb

Party Name: Tammen v. San Diego County

Attorney: [7] Trippet, Yoakum & Ballantyne, Oscar A. Trippet and Thomas H. Carver for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] McInnis, Focht & Fitgerald and William T. Fitzgerald for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Harry S. Fenton, Robert F. Carlson and Kenneth G. Nellis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Res...

Case Date: April 26, 1967

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

66 Cal.2d 468, 29026, Tammen v. San Diego County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 29 Cal.2d 144, 19299, Lohman v. Lohman
California - 55 Cal.2d 211, 7229, Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist.
California - 57 Cal.2d 488, 7370, Corning Hospital Dist. v. Superior Court of Tehama County
California - 57 Cal.2d 502, 20921, Dias v. Eden Township Hospital District
California - 59 Cal.2d 686, 21259, Thompson v. Fresno County

See all quotations