254 Cal.App.2d 335, 11483, Hom v. Chico Unified School Dist.

Citation: 254 Cal.App.2d 335, 61 Cal.Rptr. 920

Opinion Judge: [10] Friedman

Party Name: Hom v. Chico Unified School Dist.

Attorney: [7] P. M. Barceloux, Burton J. Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, David J. McKeown and Albert E. Levy for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Laughlin, Craig & Christensen and Nels A. Christensen for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday September 14, 1967

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

254 Cal.App.2d 335, 11483, Hom v. Chico Unified School Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 55 Cal.2d 211, 7229, Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist.
California - 57 Cal.2d 502, 20921, Dias v. Eden Township Hospital District
California - 58 Cal.2d 811, 7420, Thelander v. Superior Court of Placer County
California - 66 Cal.2d 468, 29026, Tammen v. San Diego County
California - 230 Cal.App.2d 520, 10876, Flournoy v. State

See all quotations