Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

from September 2001
Last Number: June 2023

University of Arizona
ISSN 1533-4724




Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 367

March 22, 2011

  • When is finality ... final? Rehearing and resurrection in the Supreme Court.

  • Abandoning law reports for official digital case law.

  • "A watchdog for the good of the order": the Ninth Circuit's en banc coordinator.

  • Does the readability of your brief affect your chance of winning an appeal? An analysis of readability in appellate briefs and its correlation with success on appeal.

  • Federal Standards of Review, 4th ed.

  • March 22, 2014

  • Calling on U.S. courts to adopt Canada's unified approach to statutory interpretation.

  • Achieving better court management through better data.

  • March 22, 2015

  • George Washington, Elena Kagan, and the town of Greece, New York: the First Amendment and religious minorities.

  • A practical guide to appellate judging.

  • Is limited remand required if the district court admitted or excluded evidence without a Daubert analysis?

  • A past and future of judicial elections: the case of Montana.

  • A past and future of judicial elections: the case of Montana.

  • The statute, the Constitution, the caselaw, and the appellate lawyer as sleuth.

  • September 22, 2001

  • Coping with disaster.

  • The politics of Bush v. Gore.

  • Toward a community of professionalism.

  • The office of Solicitor General.

  • When the President says 'no': a few thoughts on executive power and the tradition of Solicitor General independence.

  • In the shadow of Daniel Webster: arguing appeals in the twenty-first century.

  • The evolving role of the state solicitor: toward the federal model?

  • Tribute to the Honorable Rex E. Lee Solicitor General of the United States 1981-85.

  • Appeals in the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals: structure, procedure, and recent cases.

  • An update on the Ninth Circuit debate.

  • Felons, firearms, and federalism: reconsidering Scarborough in light of Lopez.

  • Writing a better brief: the civil appeals style manual of the Office of the Maryland Attorney General.

  • Classical citation.

  • March 22, 2002

  • From Anastasoff to Hart to West's Federal Appendix: the ground shifts under no-citation rules.

  • The Supreme Court of Canada: its history, powers and responsibilities.

  • Taking its toll: partisan judging and judicial review.

  • Justice White's principled passion for consistency.

  • Appellate review of multi-claim general verdicts: the life and premature death of the Baldwin principle.

  • Objective analysis of advocacy preferences and prevalent mythologies in one California Appellate Court.

  • Appellate mediation in New Mexico: an evaluation.

  • New Hampshire's three-judge expedited docket.

  • The expedited appeals process for the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

  • Expedited appeals in Indiana: too little, too late.

  • Expedited appeals in Kentucky.

  • Possible, but not likely: expedited appeals in Massachusetts.

  • Freestyle lawyering: an expedited appeal in the New York state courts.

  • 'Can we go home now?': expediting adoption and termination of parental rights appeals in Ohio state courts.

  • To expediency and beyond: Vermont's Rocket Docket.

  • Appellate procedure in West Virginia: why Rule 4A's expedited petition process isn't attractive to attorneys.

  • Confidential chat on the craft of briefing.

  • September 22, 2002

  • Judge, scholar, and friend.

  • Document destruction after Arthur Andersen: is it still housekeeping or is it a crime?

  • A few thoughts on the importance of an independent judiciary.

  • Unpleasant duties: imposing sanctions for frivolous appeals.

  • Accessing the law.

  • From pens to pixels: text-media issues in promulgating, archiving, and using judicial opinions.

  • On the Internet, nobody knows you're a judge: appellate courts' use of Internet materials.