Is limited remand required if the district court admitted or excluded evidence without a Daubert analysis?
›
Linked as:Extract
Is limited remand required if the district court admitted or excluded evidence without a Daubert analysis?
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 161 F.3d 77 (1st Cir. 1998), 98-1163, Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.
- Federal Cases - 732 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), 11-2349, Smith v. Dorchester Real Estate, Inc.
- Federal Cases - 591 F.2d 195 (2nd Cir. 1979), 226, Samuels v. Health and Hospitals Corp. of City of New York
- Federal Cases - 466 F.2d 593 (7th Cir. 1972), 71-1339, Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Martin
- Federal Cases - 740 F.2d 1373 (6th Cir. 1984), 83-1490, United States v. Holloway
