Jones Law Review

COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.
COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

from January 2002
Last Number: March 2009

Thomas Goode Jones School of Law




This publication was edited under a different title from 2009 onwards: <a href='http://vlex.com/source/5270' target='_blank'>Faulkner Law Review</a>

Cantidad de documentos en esta fuente: 47

September 22, 2007

  • Our dirty little secret recording: a history and critique of ethical rules regarding lawyers secretly recording conversations.

  • Can Jiminy Cricket be silenced? Congressional spending powers, federalism, and the federal refusal clause.

  • Regulating capital markets: competition, harmonization and cooperation - a theoretical inquiry.

  • Equal Access to Justice Act cuts off equal access for social security claimants.

  • Trott v. Brinks and reimbursement: why Alabama's third-party statute should be amended.

  • A policy decision in the high court: how global warming eroded the standing requirement: Massachusetts v. EPA.

    • March 22, 2007

  • Exclusion of the exclusionary rule: Hudson v. Michigan.

  • The Fourth Amendment's consent to entry exception: protecting the castle from the co-tenant's consent: Georgia V. Randolph.

  • The Garcetti test: limiting a public employee's freedom of speech and the constitutional implications on academic speech: Garcetti v. Ceballos.

  • Limiting speech at funerals: analysis and proposal for jurisprudence.

    • January 01, 2002

  • Helping graduates who fail the bar examination.

  • Trying children as adults.

  • Green Tree v. Randolph: will this court's decision lessen the effect of the FAA in consumer arbitration?

  • Alabama's evolving standard of admissibility for expert scientific testimony.

    • January 01, 2003

  • Water resource protection in Alabama: the need for a paradigm change.

  • The struggle in Alabama for constitutional reform.

  • What a poor defense! Exploring the ineffectiveness of counsel for the poor and searching for a solution.

  • Preparation of the trial lawyer for mediation.

  • Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union.

  • Atkins v. Virginia: the costs of arriving at a decision to exempt the mentally retarded from execution.

    • January 01, 2004

  • The year-and-a-day rule: a common law vestige that has outlived its purpose.

  • Challenges and opportunities in the law.

  • Promoting or frustrating the statute of frauds? Implications from Holman v. Childersburg Bancorporation, Inc.

  • Reformulating medical malpractice: Ex parte Healthsouth Corp. and its ramifications for medical malpractice law in Alabama.

  • Forced competence: a defendant's right to reject involuntarily administered antipsychotic drug treatment.

    • January 01, 2005

  • Access to civil commitment proceedings & records in Alabama: balancing privacy rights and the presumption of openness.

  • Walls v. Alpharma: is the learned intermediary doctrine the right cure for pharmacists in Alabama?

  • Some time in the shade: giving the public's legal counsel some relief under Alabama's Sunshine Law.

    • January 01, 2006

  • Opening remarks.

  • The current state of the Voting Rights Act: should it be renewed, amended, or allowed to expire?

  • Alabama law of dedication and reservation: it's a good thing: Beachcroft Properties, LLP v. City of Alabaster.

  • Civil forfeitures of real property in Alabama: lack of knowledge is power to an innocent owner.

    • September 22, 2006

  • Binding predispute arbitration clauses in Alabama: a checkered past but a solid future.

  • Thou shalt not expunge Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Lackey.

  • The logical conclusion to reasonably calculated notice: actual notice: Jones v. Flowers.

  • The demise of the knock-and-announce rule: Hudson v. Michigan.

    • March 22, 2008

  • The Roberts Court and the death penalty code.

  • Racism on our juries: the impossibility of impartiality in capital cases.

  • Capital punishment: advocates' deadly combination of inadequacy and misconduct.

  • Determining mental retardation in capital defendants: using a strict IQ cut-off number will allow the execution of many that Atkins intended to spare: ex parte State (Smith v. State).

    • September 22, 2008

  • Domestic violence, flawed interpretations of 42 U.S.C. s. 1437D(l) (6), sexual harassment in public housing, and municipal violations of the Eighth Amendment: making women homeless and keeping them homeless.

  • You be the judge: avoiding attorney discipline by taking the bench: Ex parte Alabama State Bar.

  • Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.

    • March 22, 2009

  • The extraterritorial application of Title VII: an argument for an informal foreign compulsion defense.

  • Chambers v. United States: filling in the gaps when interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act.

  • Class arbitration: someone please forward a copy of the Bazzle decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.

  • Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.