Griffin v. UNOCAL: a solution to the Garrett Conundrum and the end of the last exposure rule.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 81 F.Supp. 414 (N.D.Ala. 1948), 5932, Minyard v. Woodward Iron Co.
• Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 86 (1993), 91-794, Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation
• Alabama - 43 Ala. 173 (Ala. 1869), Sanders v. Cabaniss
• Alabama - 104 So. 847 (Ala.App. 1925), 3 Div. 494, Allgood v. State
• Alabama - 183 So. 677 (Ala. 1938), 7 Div. 506, American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Agricola Furnace Co.



See all quotations

• Alabama - 49 So. 849 (Ala. 1909), West Pratt Coal Co. v. Dorman
• Alabama - 75 So. 291 (Ala. 1917), 6 Div. 523, Kelley v. Shropshire
• Alabama - 285 So.2d 468 (Ala. 1973), SC 155, Home Ins. Co. v. Stuart-McCorkle, Inc.
• Alabama - 340 So.2d 764 (Ala. 1976), SC 1743, Garren v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
• Alabama - 368 So.2d 516 (Ala. 1979), 77-606, Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.
• Alabama - 416 So.2d 996 (Ala. 1982), 80-459, Lankford v. Sullivan, Long & Hagerty
• Alabama - 453 So.2d 735 (Ala. 1984), 82-409, Lloyd v. Service Corp. of Alabama, Inc.
• Alabama - 596 So.2d 888 (Ala. 1992), 1900992, Hillis v. Rentokil, Inc.
• Alabama - 853 So.2d 933 (Ala. 2003), 1012088, City of Daphne v. City of Spanish Fort
• Alabama - 970 So.2d 755 (Ala. 2007), 1041076, Cline v. Ashland, Inc.