Totel Ltd v Commissioners for HM’s Revenue and Customs
Linked as:
Extract
Totel Ltd v Commissioners for HM’s Revenue and Customs
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
- Marks & Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 1, No 3 and Case C-62/00)
- The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (Petitioners/Appellants) v Changtel Solutions UK Ltd (formerly Enta Technologies Ltd)
- Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust; Fletcher v Midland Bank Plc (C-78/98)
RESUELVE RECURSO
AFFIRMS
CONSIDERS
- Littlewoods Ltd and Others (Respondents/Claimants) v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
- HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer (sub nom Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth)
- Finance Act 2003 - Articles : SCH-10
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy)
- Lloyd v Google LLC
APPLIED in
- Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and Others
- Steer v Stormsure Ltd
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
This document cites
- Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust; Fletcher v Midland Bank Plc (C-78/98)
- Totel Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
- The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (Petitioners/Appellants) v Changtel Solutions UK Ltd (formerly Enta Technologies Ltd)
- Littlewoods Ltd and Others (Respondents/Claimants) v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
- HM Revenue and Customs v Stringer (sub nom Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Ainsworth)
