Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• [Court of Session—1st Division.]

REFERS TO

• Fordyce v Bridges
• Amicus and Others v Dynamex Friction Ltd and another
• R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

[See more]

• ENERGYSOLUTIONS EU Ltd v NucLear Decommissioning Authority
• Sanderson & Son v Armour & Company
• Rippin Group Ltd, v ITP Interpipe SA
• Hawkins v Wedderburn
• R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2)
• Karl Construction Ltd v Palisade Properties Plc
• Atkinson & Wood v Mackintosh
• Rippin Group Ltd v Itp Interpipe Sa
• Hamlyn & Company v Talisker Distillery
• Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy)
• Totel Ltd v Commissioners for HM’s Revenue and Customs
• Phonographic Performances Ltd v Department of Trade and Industry
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
• MacDonald v MacDonald

CONSIDERS

• Employment Rights Act 1996 - Articles : S-15
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Judgments Extension Act 1868

[See more]

• Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : S-27
• Equality Act 2010 - Articles : S-26
• Judgments Extension Act 1868
• Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010

AFFIRMS

• Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] ICR 146

This document cites

• Totel Ltd v Commissioners for HM’s Revenue and Customs
• ENERGYSOLUTIONS EU Ltd v NucLear Decommissioning Authority
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
• Phonographic Performances Ltd v Department of Trade and Industry
• R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry



See all quotations

• R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2)
• [Court of Session—1st Division.]
• MacDonald v MacDonald
• Rippin Group Ltd, v ITP Interpipe SA
• Rippin Group Ltd v Itp Interpipe Sa
• Sanderson & Son v Armour & Company
• Hawkins v Wedderburn
• Fordyce v Bridges
• Karl Construction Ltd v Palisade Properties Plc
• Amicus and Others v Dynamex Friction Ltd and another
• Atkinson & Wood v Mackintosh
• Hamlyn & Company v Talisker Distillery
• Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
• Judgments Extension Act 1868
• Equality Act 2010
• Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010
• Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands.
• Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others.
• Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy.
• Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia.
• The Minister for Justice and Equality and The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána v Workplace Relations Commission.
• Rosalba Palmisani contra Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).
• European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
• ML v Aktiva Finants OÜ.
• Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern.
• ENEFI Energiahatékonysági Nyrt v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (DGRFP).
• Commission of the European Communities v Ireland.
• Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC
• Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control