The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998
• Water Industry Act 1991
• Water Act 1989

[See more]

• Interpretation Act 1978
• Water Act 1973
• Public Health Act 1936
• Public Health Act 1875
• Chancery Amendment Act 1858
• Metropolis Management Act 1855
• Public Health Act 1848
• Towns Improvement Clauses Act 1847
• Local Government Act 1858 - Articles : S-XXX

DISTINGUISHES

• Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd

REVERSES

• The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd

REFERS TO

• Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd; Maloco v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms
• Jaggard v Sawyer

[See more]

• Goldsmid v Tunbridge Wells Improvement Commissioners
• Baron v Portslade Urban Council
• Manchester, Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of v Farnworth
• Durrant v Branksome Urban District Council
• Robinson v Corporation of Workington
• Hole v Chard Union
• Attorney General v Lewes Corporation
• Jones v Llanrwst Urban Council
• John Young and Company v Bankier Distillery Company
• Price's Patent Candle Company v London County Council
• Attorney General v Hackney Local Board
• Job Edwards Ltd v Birmingham Navigations
• The Queen, on the Prosecution of Thomas Taylor, against The Darlington Local Board of Health
• The Queen against The Darlington Local Board of Health
• Cooper v Board of Works for the Wandsworth Destrict
• Attorney General v The Council of The Borough of Birmingham
• Oldaker v Hunt
• HM Revenue and Customs v Total Network SL
• Attorney-General v Leeds Corporation
• Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd
• Pasmore and Others v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council
• Stovin and Another v Norfolk County Council
• Ms Julie Marion Nicholson v Thames Water Utilities Ltd Mts Cleansing Services Ltd (Third Party)
• Hanifa Dobson and Others v Thames Water Utilities Ltd and The Water Services Regulation Authority
• Mr Sydney Bell and Another v Northumbrian Water Ltd
• Lee Dennis Oldcorn and Another v Southern Water Services Ltd
• Morris-Garner and another v One Step (Support) Ltd
• Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
• R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd
• Fearn and Others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery
• Harrison Jalla and Others v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company
• Humphries v Cousins
• Glossop v Heston and Isleworth Local Board
• Geddis v Proprietors of Bann Reservoir
• Metropolitan Asylum District v Hill
• Attorney General v Guardians of Poor of Union of Dorking
• British Waterways Board v Severn Trent Water Ltd
• R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
• Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd
• Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
• Radstock Co-operative and Industrial Society Ltd v Norton-Radstock Urban District Council
• Department of Transport v North West Water Authority
• Goldman v Hargrave
• Smeaton v Ilford Corporation
• Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd and Earl of Harrington v British Celanese Ltd
• Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others