The Arpad

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• The Arpad

REVERSES

• The Arpad

CONSIDERS

• Horne v Midland Railway Company

CITES

• Fleming v Manchester and Sheffield Railway Company
• Gee v The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
• Great Western Railway Company v Redmayne; Redmayne v Great Western Railway Company

[See more]

• Hinde v Liddell
• Wertheim v Chicoutimi Pulp Company
• Hollins v Fowler
• Chinery v Viall
• Hiort v London and North Western Railway Company
• Williams Brothers v Agius (Ed. T.)
• Patrick v Russo-British Grain Export Company
• Elder, Dempster & Company v Paterson, Zochonis & Company ; Griffiths Lewis Steam Navigation Company v Paterson, Zochonis & Company
• Stroms Bruk Aktie Bolag v John and Peter Hutchison (A Firm)
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• The Harmonides
• British Columbia Saw Mill Company v Nettleship
• Hadley v Baxendale
• Rodocanachi v Milburn
• Hall (R & H.) Ltd v W. H. Pim (Junior) & Company 's Arbitration
• Cobb v Great Western Railway Company
• "Gracie" (Owners of the) v "Argentino" (Owners of the). The "Argentino"
• Borries and Others v Hutchinson
• Gr‚bert-Borgnis v Nugent

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 18 Asp Mar Law Cas 510
• [1935] 51 LlLRep 115
• 50 TLR 505

[See more]

• [1934] P 189

CITED in

• Attorney General of the Republic of Ghana v Texaco Overseas Tankships Ltd (Texaco Melbourne)
• The Aramis
• Bhpb Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 4)

[See more]

• Heskell v Continental Express, Ltd, and Another
• Carlos Federspiel & Company SA v Charles Twigg & Company Ltd
• Geogas S.A. v Trammo Gas Ltd (Baleares)
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraq Airways Company
• Hardip Singh v Rashed Yaqubi
• Satef-Huttenes Albertus S.p.A. v Paloma Tercera Shipping Company S.A. (Pegase)
• Heskell v Continental Express Ltd
• Integral Petroleum SA v SCU-Finanz AG
• Fairmacs Shipping & Transport Services Pte Ltd v Harikutai Engineering Pte Ltd
• Attorney General of the Republic of Ghana v Texaco Overseas Tankships Ltd (Texaco Melbourne)

CONSIDERED in

• Esso Exploration & Production UK Ltd v Electricity Supply Board
• Mohammmed Idris Jabir v H.a. Jordan & Company Ltd
• British Telecommunications Plc v Geraghty & Miller International Inc.

[See more]

• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
• Kuwait Airways Corporation (Plaintiff) v Iraqi Airways Company (body Corporate)
• National Australia Bank Ltd v Nemur Varity Pty. Ltd

REFERRED in

• Cunningham Ltd v Codan Shipping Company Ltd
• Attorney General of the Republic of Ghana v Texaco Overseas Tankships Ltd (Texaco Melbourne)
• Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company

[See more]

• Transfield Shipping Inc. v Mercator Shipping Inc. (The Achilleas)
• Smith v Leech Brain & Company Ltd
• Chartered Electronics Industries Pte Ltd v Comtech IT Pte Ltd
• The "Asia Star"
• Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos (Heron II)

APPLIED in

• Saleslease Ltd v Davis

This document cites

• Elder, Dempster & Company v Paterson, Zochonis & Company ; Griffiths Lewis Steam Navigation Company v Paterson, Zochonis & Company
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Hall (R & H.) Ltd v W. H. Pim (Junior) & Company 's Arbitration
• Fleming v Manchester and Sheffield Railway Company
• Cobb v Great Western Railway Company



See all quotations

• Hiort v London and North Western Railway Company
• "Gracie" (Owners of the) v "Argentino" (Owners of the). The "Argentino"
• The Notting Hill
• Chinery v Viall
• Hadley v Baxendale
• Borries and Others v Hutchinson
• Gee v The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company
• Watts, Watts & Company v Mitsui & Company
• Williams Brothers v Agius (Ed. T.)
• Patrick v Russo-British Grain Export Company
• Stroms Bruk Aktie Bolag v John and Peter Hutchison (A Firm)
• The Arpad
• "Gracie" (Owners of the) v "Argentino" (Owners of the). The "Argentino"
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Great Western Railway Company v Redmayne; Redmayne v Great Western Railway Company
• The Harmonides
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Wertheim v Chicoutimi Pulp Company
• British Columbia Saw Mill Company v Nettleship
• The Parana
• Rodocanachi v Milburn
• Rodocanachi v Milburn
• Gr‚bert-Borgnis v Nugent
• Hinde v Liddell
• Hollins v Fowler
• Horne v Midland Railway Company
• Port of Queenborough Development Company, Ltd v David Evans and Company
• Cobb v Great Western Railway Company
• Sale of Goods Act 1893
• Rodocanachi, Sons & Company v Milburn Brothers