Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• The Abidin Daver
• Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Shah v Immigration Appeal Tribunal

[See more]

• Société du Gaz de Paris v Armateurs français
• Anderson v Hunter
• Clements v Macaulay. [Court of Session—2d Division.]
• Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
• Lord Advocate v Dunglas
• R (Majead) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
• Sim v Robinow

REFERS TO

• King v East Ayrshire Council
• Hanlon v Traffic Commissioner
• Acutt v Acutt

[See more]

• Somerville v Lord Advocate
• Lord Advocate v Dunglas
• Mackintosh v Arkley
• Struk v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Campbell v Brown
• Moss' Empires Ltd v Assessor for Glasgow
• WILLIAM LAURISTON WEST Petitioner (Reclaimer) against SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE Respondents
• Soutar's Executors v James Murray & Company (Cupar) Ltd
• Société du Gaz de Paris v Société Anonyme de Navigation ‘Les Armateurs Francais.’
• Guaranty Trust Company of New York v Hannay & Company
• The Owners of The Ship "Las Mercedes" (Applicants (Plaintiffs) v The Owners of The Ship "Abidin Daver" and Others (Respondents
• Stevenson v Midlothian District Council
• Clements v Macaulay
• Rutherford v Lord Advocate
• Mfumu v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Cameron v Lord Advocate
• Brown v Hamilton District Council

CONSIDERS

• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : SCH-9
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : S-21
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : S-46

[See more]

• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : SCH-8
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : S-20
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-12
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 - Articles : S-69
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 - Articles : S-170
• Scotland Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-8
• Income Tax Act 1918
• Crown Suits (Scotland) Act 1857
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
• Sim v Robinow
• Sokha v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
• Lord Advocate v R.W. Forsyth Ltd
• Longworth or Yelverton v Yelverton
• R v Income Tax Special Purposes Commissioner.ex parte R W. Forsyth Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITES

• Agee v Lord Advocate
• Jack v Jack (1940)

APPROVES

• R (Shah) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal Secretary of State for the Home Department interested party
• R (Majead) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Secretary of State for the Home Department, interested party

CONSIDERED in

• R (on the application of Kashif) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (JR jurisdiction: applicant in Scotland)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Lisa Smith
• R Ayman Eid Kaldas Girgis v Joint Committee on Intercollegiate Examinations

[See more]

• McVeigh’s (David) Application
• Biffin Ltd and Others v HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
• Mr Asif Khurshid v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Deliu v The New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal
• Openyd Ltd v Lawrence, Lawrence, Trubshoe and Silk
• Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Redcliffe Forestry Venture Ltd
• Arthur William Taylor v The Attorney–General HC AK
• New Zealand Law Society v Deliu
• Fun World Company Ltd v The Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes
• Bowview Overseas Ltd v Aleman, Cordero, Galindo & Lee Trust (BVI) Ltd
• Bowview Overseas Ltd v Aleman, Cordero, Galindo & Lee Trust (BVI) Ltd

CITED in

• McVeigh's Application
• Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [Sup Ct]
• Mr Asif Khurshid v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Blajosse Charlotte Eba (ap) V. The Advocate General For Scotland

REFERRED in

• Blajosse Charlotte Eba For Judicial Review Of The Refusal Of An Appeal To The First Tier Tribunal
• R (on the application of Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice (Attorney General of Jersey and the States of Guernsey intervening)
• Fourie v Le Roux and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 2007 SC HL 1
• 18/10/2006 Daily Cases
• [2007] 1 All ER 559

[See more]

• [2006] NR Uned 188
• [24/10/2006] TLR 1
• 2006 103 LG 42 35
• 2006 SCLR 879
• [2006] 150 SJ 1395
• [2007] INLR 80
• 2006 Scot (D) 19/7
• [2007] 1 AC 521
• [2006] 3 WLR 699

RELIED UPON in

• The King (on the application of the Competition and Markets Authority) v The Competition Appeal Tribunal

This document cites

---

• Stevenson v Midlothian District Council
• The Abidin Daver
• Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
• Shah v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite



See all quotations

• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
• The Owners of The Ship "Las Mercedes" (Applicants (Plaintiffs) v The Owners of The Ship "Abidin Daver" and Others (Respondents
• Brown v Hamilton District Council
• R (Majead) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• Sokha v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Clements v Macaulay
• Lord Advocate v Dunglas
• Cameron v Lord Advocate
• Agee v Lord Advocate
• Société du Gaz de Paris v Société Anonyme de Navigation ‘Les Armateurs Francais.’
• R (Majead) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Secretary of State for the Home Department, interested party
• Anderson v Hunter
• Struk v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Hanlon v Traffic Commissioner
• Sim v Robinow
• Rutherford v Lord Advocate
• Jack v Jack (1940)
• R (Shah) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal Secretary of State for the Home Department interested party
• Campbell v Brown
• Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
• Moss' Empires Ltd v Assessor for Glasgow
• Lord Advocate v Dunglas
• Soutar's Executors v James Murray & Company (Cupar) Ltd
• R v Income Tax Special Purposes Commissioner.ex parte R W. Forsyth Ltd
• Clements v Macaulay. [Court of Session—2d Division.]
• WILLIAM LAURISTON WEST Petitioner (Reclaimer) against SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE Respondents
• Mackintosh v Arkley
• Mfumu v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• King v East Ayrshire Council