Extract
Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
RESUELVE RECURSO
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
APPEAL RESOLVED in
CITED in
This document cites
-
Federal Cases - 101 U.S. 16 (1880), Bowditch v. City Of Boston
-
Federal Cases - 212 U.S. 297 (1909), 34, Juragua Iron Co., Ltd. v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 120 U.S. 227 (1887), United States v. Pacific R.r.
-
Federal Cases - 344 U.S. 149 (1952), 16, United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.
-
Federal Cases - 95 U.S. 117 (1877), Aetna Ins. Co. v. Boon
See all quotations
-
Atlantic Maritime Company Inc. v Gibbon (Atlantic Trader.)
-
Lord Mayor, Company of Bradford v Myers
-
Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
-
Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
-
Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.v v Administrator of Hungarian Property
-
Edinburgh & District Tramways Company Ltd v Courtenay
-
Commercial and Estates Company of Egypt v Board of Trade
-
Grieve v Edinburgh and District Water Trustees
-
London and North Western Railway Company v Evans
-
Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) v Cannon Brewery Company Ltd
-
Commissioner of Public Works (Cape Colony) v Logan
-
Kauffmann Brothers v Liverpool Corporation
-
Fortington v Lord Kinnaird
-
Crown of Leon (Owners) v Admiralty Commissioners
-
Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
-
Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
-
Re Ferdinand, Ex-Tsar of Bulgaria
-
North British Railway Company Company v Greig
-
Woodruff v Attorney General for Ontario
-
Butler against Wildman
-
The Zamora
-
Scammell (G.) & Nephew v Hurley
-
Department of Agriculturefor Ireland, Rooney v(No. 2)
-
Re Petition of Right
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Newcastle Breweries Ltd
-
France Fenwick & Company v The King
-
Mackeson v Boyd
-
Robert Baird Ltd, and Others v Glasgow City Corporation
-
Holsworthy Urban Council v Holsworthy Rural Council
-
McPhail v Lanarkshire County Council