Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
Linked as:
Extract
Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Robert Lindsay Hughes v R
- SYMSS v The Queen
- SKA v R
- Accc v Cc (Nsw) Pty Ltd
- BC v R
- Ex parte Campbell. Re Cathcart
- Brs v R
- Jacara Pty Ltd v Auto-Bake Pty Ltd
- R v H (1995)
- BBH v The Queen
- The Queen v Leonard Theodore Lam
- IMM v The Queen
- R v Folbigg
- Aleksander Vojneski(Appellant) v The Queen
- Krm v R
- Police v Dunstall
- R v Z
- R v Simpson
- Thompson and Wran v R
- De Jesus v R
- Hoch v R
- RHB v The Queen
- Melbourne v R
- Martin v Osborne
- AE v R
- GBF v The Queen
- Hml v R; Sb v R; Oae v R
- Phillips v R
- CEG v The Queen
- Papakosmas v R
- Platz v Osborne
- Aung Thu(Applicant) v The Queen
- R v Nassif
- Perry v R
- Thompson v Smith
- Pfennig v R
- Gipp v R
- Philip William Doyle v Crown
- Matthew Peter O'keefe v R; R v Matthew Peter O'keefe
- R v Carroll
- Stubley v Western Australia
- AC v R
- R v Martin
- R v Lavender
- Neal Richard Winter v R
- DPP v P
- R v Milton
- Alford v Magee
- Elomar v R
- Hargraves v The Queen
- Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees Wa Ltd
- R v Markuleski
- Bp v R; R v Bp
- Mfa v R
- K & S Lake City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd
- R v Boardman
- R v St Edmundsbury BC ex parte Davidson
- Nam v The Queen
- Markby v R
- MR v The Queen
- R v Colby
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- BI(Applicant) v The Queen
- R v NO
- Martin Henderson (A Pseudonym) v The Queen
- R v Williams
- Strachan v R
- R v Hammond
- Robert John Adams(Appellant) v R (Respondent Crown)
- The Queen v Hiko
- R v Alas
- R v Bdi
- Tamara Hunt (A Pseudonym) v The Queen
- TB v R
- Reeves (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- The Queen v Wicks
- The Queen v Dixon-Hargraves
- Marsh v The Queen
- R v Kisun (No 2)
- R v Chute (No 6)
- The Director of Public Prosecutions v DL
- BI v The Queen (No 2)
- R v Aitchison
- Davey v Miller
- Fischetti v The Queen
- Robert Donohoe(Applicant) v The Crown
- Armstrong v R
- Stanley James Kelly(Appellant) v The Queen
- Sarah Jane Parkinson(Appellant) v Leesa Alexander
- R(Appellant) v SG
- Davis v R
- R v Batagoda
- R v DL
- R v Johnson (No 2)
- Re Murdoch (Ruling No 2)
- R v Jamie Christopher Walker
- Dilan Avalos (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- R v Chatimba (No 1)
- BC v R
- Erickson (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- Jaxon Dun (a Pseudonym) v The Queen
- Director of Public Prosecutions v Thomas Pearson (a pseudonym)
- Brc v R
- Smith (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- Di Natale (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- Hoyle v The Queen
- Townsend (a pseudonym) v The King
- Madden v R
- FB v R
- Krojs v R
- Sarah Jane Parkinson(Appellant) v Leesa Alexander
- Ethan Cano (a pseudonym) v The Queen
- Kanbut v R
- Boucher v The Queen
- Klein (a pseudonym) v The King
- R v Davidson (No. 1)
- R v Bentley; R v Thomas; R v Tilley; R v Davies
- R v Latu
- R v Khazma
- R v Jenkin (No 8)
- R v Johnson (No 6)
- R v Jenkin (No 10)
- R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 3)
- R v Sparos
- R v Nikolovski (No 1)
- R v Jamie Christopher Walker
- R v Jamie Christopher Walker
- R v Parker (No. 2)
- R v BK
- R v Sharpe (No 5)
- Chol v Sydney Trains (No 2)
- R v Dawson
- Flanagan v Bernasconi
- R v Dukagjini
- R v Green (No 9)
- R v Darcy
- R v Batak (No 2)
- R v Wilson (No 3)
- The Queen v EG
- The Queen v Cusack
- The Queen v Wanambi
- The Queen v Malibirr
- The Queen v ML (No 2)
- The Queen v Dumoo
- The Queen v Page (No 1)
- The Queen v Page (No 2)
- The Queen v CC
- The King v Gwynne (No 3)
- Pratten v R
- The Owners – Strata Plan 87265 v Saaib; Alexandrova v The Owners – Strata Plan 87265
- R v Rumsby (No 4)
- Subject to publication restrictions
- Vagg v R
- Douglas Matthews (a pseudonym) v The King
- Burns-Dederer v R
- R v Rumsby (No 2)
- La Rocca v R
- TT v The Diocese of Saint Maron, Sydney & SS (No 2)
- The Queen v Rolfe (No 7)
- Hartnett v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Wilcannia-Forbes (No 2)
- Sharman (a pseudonym) v The King
- Harlen (a pseudonym) v The King
- The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore v GLJ
- Sharman (a pseudonym) v The King
- Muriniti v Kalil
- Rhodes (a pseudonym) v The King
- Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v RDT
- Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Yu
- The Queen v AW
- The Queen v Nudjulu
- R v Coskun
- Coskun v R
- SA v R
- Fares v The King
- Dennis Bauer (A Pseudonym) (No 2) v The Queen
- Benton (a pseudonym) v The King
- McPhillamy v The Queen
- Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Rick Tucker (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
- Geraghty v R
- Taylor v R
- R v Martin (No 2)
- R v Chase (a pseudonym)
- The King v Eaton
- Plaintiff A and B v Bird; Plaintiff C v Bird; Plaintiff D v Bird
- The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym)
- Saunders v R
- Franklin (a pseudonym) v The King
- Lee (a pseudonym) v The King
- Anthony v Morton
[See more]
This document cites
- Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons (Ont.) et al., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 115 (CA)
- Krm v R
- Hargraves v The Queen
- The Queen v Leonard Theodore Lam
- Mfa v R
- R v Carroll
- Phillips v R
- R v Martin
- AC v R
- Police v Dunstall
- Stubley v Western Australia
- R v Colby
- Nam v The Queen
- GBF v The Queen
- DPP (on Behalf of HM) v Christie (Criminal Appeal)
- R v Nassif
- R v Lavender
- Philip William Doyle v Crown
- Robert Lindsay Hughes v R
- AE v R
- Aung Thu(Applicant) v The Queen
- SKA v R
- DPP v P
- Aleksander Vojneski(Appellant) v The Queen
- Matthew Peter O'keefe v R; R v Matthew Peter O'keefe
- R v Folbigg
- Neal Richard Winter v R
- Bp v R; R v Bp
- SYMSS v The Queen
- R v Boardman
- RHB v The Queen
- R v Simpson
- R v H (1995)
- R v Markuleski
- MR v The Queen
