Coskun v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Mitchell v The King; Rigney v The King; Carver v The King; Tenhoopen v The King
• Johns v R
• IL v R

[See more]

• R v Jacobs and Mehajer
• R v Batak
• Filippou v The Queen
• HCF v The Queen
• Edwards v The Queen
• Hudd v R
• R v Coskun
• TL v The King
• Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
• The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym)
• McPhillamy v The Queen
• Christopher Greenhalgh(Applicant) v R
• ARS v R
• Beattie v R
• GBF v The Queen
• Edward Moses Obeid(Applicant) v Crown
• R v Coskun (No 5)
• House v R
• Hili v The Queen

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2024] NSWCCA 67

CONSIDERED in

• Batak v R

This document cites

• McPhillamy v The Queen
• Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
• R v Jacobs and Mehajer
• Filippou v The Queen
• Edward Moses Obeid(Applicant) v Crown



See all quotations

• ARS v R
• Hudd v R
• Christopher Greenhalgh(Applicant) v R
• The Queen v Dennis Bauer (a pseudonym)
• Hili v The Queen
• IL v R
• R v Jarmain
• Miller v R; Smith v R; Presley v Director of Public Prosecutions (South Australia)
• Johns v R
• Mcauliffe (Sp) v R; Mcauliffe (Dj) v R
• House v R
• GBF v The Queen
• Edwards v The Queen
• Beattie v R
• R v Coskun (No 5)
• TL v The King
• Mitchell v The King; Rigney v The King; Carver v The King; Tenhoopen v The King
• R v Batak
• R v Coskun
• HCF v The Queen
• Batak v R