Ramdhanie and Others v State of Trinidad and Tobago

Afetações

CONSIDERS

• Mohammed v The State
• Johnson (Gregory) v R

[Veja Mais]

• R v Aziz
• Barrow v The Queen
• Kizza Sealey and Another v The State
• Anderson (James McAulay) v HM Advocate

REFERS TO

• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall
• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago

CONSIDERS

• Ann Marie Boodram v The State

CITES (NEUTRAL)

• Barrow v State

[Veja Mais]

• JAMES McAULAY ANDERSON v HM ADVOCATE
• Randall v R
• Bally Sheng Balson v The State

REPORTED OPINION OF by

• (2005) 67 WIR 340
• 15/12/2005 Daily Cases
• [2006] 3 LRC 350

[Veja Mais]

• [2006] 1 WLR 796

REFERRED by

• Gomes v Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
• Christie (Viris) v R
• Troy Simon Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

[Veja Mais]

• Derek Cort Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• Patrick Lovelace Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

CITED NEUTRAL by

• Rajendra Krishna v The State
• Knowles v Knowles (Antigua and Barbuda)
• Huggins and Others v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)

[Veja Mais]

• Noel Campbell v The Queen (Jamaica)

CONSIDERED by

• R v Taylor (Anthony)
• Carlton Junior Hall v The Queen
• Warrington v The State

[Veja Mais]

• Simon v R
• Steeve Santana v R
• Lovelace v The Queen
• Mapp and Bissoon v The State
• Mohammed v The State
• Cohen v The State
• Carlton Junior Hall v The Queen
• Nurse v The Queen
• Khan and Hunt v The State

Documentos citados

• R v Aziz
• Johnson (Gregory) v R
• Benedetto v The Queen (No 2)
• Kizza Sealey and Another v The State
• Mohammed v The State



Ver todas as citas

• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• R v Vye ; R v Wise ; R v Stephenson
• Barrow v State
• Randall v R
• Anderson (James McAulay) v HM Advocate
• JAMES McAULAY ANDERSON v HM ADVOCATE
• Barrow v The Queen
• The Queen v Barry Victor Randall
• Ann Marie Boodram v The State
• Bally Sheng Balson v The State