Radwan v Radwan (No. 2)

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Pugh v Pugh
• Re Paine. Re Williams. Griffith v Waterhouse

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Padolecchia v Padolecchia (orse. Leis)

REFERS TO

• Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee
• Padolecchia v Padolecchia (orse. Leis)
• Ponticelli v Ponticelli

[See more]

• Pugh v Pugh
• Re Bethell. Bethell v Hildyard
• Re Paine. Re Williams. Griffith v Waterhouse
• Re De Wilton. De Wilton v Montefiore
• Sottomayor v De Barros
• Conway Otherwise Beazley v Beazley
• Mette v Mette
• The Hon. Lady Anne Warrender, - Appellant; The Right Hon sir George Warrender, Bart., - Respondent
• Kenward v Kenward
• Russell v Attorney General

CONSIDERS

• R v Brentwood Superintendent Registrar of Marriages, ex parte Arias

APPLIES

• De Reneville v De Reneville
• Warrender v Warrender
• Brooks v Brooks

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 3 All ER 1026
• [1972] 3 WLR 939
• [1973] Fam 35

REFERRED in

• Lawrence v Lawrence
• Perrini v Perrini
• Asma Dukali (Applicant) Mohamed Lamrani (Respondent) HM Attorney General (Intervener)

CONSIDERED in

• Nazia Parveen v Assim Balal Hussain