R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Bloggs 61) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• An Application for Judicial Review and Others (Claimants/Respondents) Gloucester City Council (Defendant/Applicant) Arrowcroft Group Plc (Interested Party)
• Rees v United Kingdom
• R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Pretty) v DPP
• A v Secretary of State
• Chahal v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• N v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Matin) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority

REFERS TO

• Britton v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kinuthia v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R(Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others

[See more]

• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran
• Svazas v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• McPherson v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Anufrijeva v Southwark London Borough Council; R (N) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (M) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Chahal (No 2)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPLIES

• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department

CITES

• R (Bloggs 61) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

APPROVES

• Hari Dhima v Immigration Appeal Tribunal

CONSIDERS

• Banomova v Secretary of State for the Home Department Case C/2000/3674
• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R (A and Others) v Lord Saville of Newdigate; R (on the application of Widgery Soldiers) v Members of The Tribunal Sitting as The Bloody Sunday Inquiry
• R (L and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
• Pro-Life Alliance v BBC
• As (Sufficiency of Protection)
• Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• Haile v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Krepel
• Tumarevic v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Semetiene
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
• Immigration Act 1971
• R v The Secretary of State for The Home Department ex parte Abdullah Turgut

DISTINGUISHES

• Soering v United Kingdom

CONSIDERED in

• R Fadil Mazrreku v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AT and Others (Article 15c; risk categories)
• R (on the application of AB) v Home Secretary

[See more]

• R Mehreen Khan v Secretary of State for Home Department
• R YUSIF ADAM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AB (Protection –criminal gangs-internal relocation)
• PS (Ltte – Internal Flight – Sufficiency of protection)
• R Manjeet Kaur v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R MK (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• DJ (Bantu-not generally at risk)
• R THARSIKA OPPILAMANI v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• HC & RC (Trafficked women)
• HC v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Folasade Esther Adenji v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• JM (Sufficiency of protection - IFA - FGM)
• R (Chantrat) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Shakeel Ahmed v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MS (Coptic Christians)
• R Rasul v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• MP [Trafficking – Sufficiency of Protection]
• JS (Victims of gang violence – Sufficiency of protection)
• R (Akram) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• JB ( Protection – Roma – Well founded fear)
• R (Tozlukaya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• KG (Review of current situation)
• VM (FGM-risks-Mungiki-Kikuyu/Gikuyu)
• The Queen (on The Application of Moinuddin Syed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Seema Sabahata and Others (Interested Parties)
• IM (Sufficiency of protection)
• SY (Israel/Jewish and Muslim marriage/risk /protection)
• DW (Homosexual Men – Persecution – Sufficiency of Protection)
• SA (Divorced woman – illegitimate child)
• RQ (Afghan National Army – Hizb-i-Islami – risk)
• R (Gezer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Borak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AK and SK (Christians: risk)
• FD (Sufficiency of Protection-Roma-Munteanu)
• R BAZDOACA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MK (Lesbians)
• GH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Atkinson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AM and BM (Trafficked women)
• AZ (Trafficked women)
• TD and AD (Trafficked women)
• Fornah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MOJ and Others (Return to Mogadishu)

CITED in

• KC (Gambia) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Szeqi v Minister for Immigration
• SA (Political Activist - Internal Relocation) Pakistan

[See more]

• LD (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Jakub Stopyra v District Court of Lublin, Poland Stopyra

REFERRED in

• R BADSHA SARDER v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Owusu v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Atkinson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• R Waqas Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R W v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Mihaylov v Regional Prosecutions Office in Burgas (Bulgaria)
• ZV (Lithuania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Gezer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• E v Secretary of State for the Home Department

RELIED UPON in

• R Owusu v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

FOLLOWED in

• MI (Pakistan) and MF (Venezuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 11/11/2003 Daily Cases
• [2004] ACD 6
• [21/11/2003] TLR 1

[See more]

• [2004] 1 WLR 1207

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Katrinac v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• An Application for Judicial Review and Others (Claimants/Respondents) Gloucester City Council (Defendant/Applicant) Arrowcroft Group Plc (Interested Party)
• Harakel v Secretary of State for Home Department
• R (Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department



See all quotations

• R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• McPherson v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Haile v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman
• As (Sufficiency of Protection)
• Kinuthia v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Pretty) v DPP
• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Wilkinson) v Broadmoor Hospital
• Banomova v Secretary of State for the Home Department Case C/2000/3674
• Svazas v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Bloggs 61) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Bloggs 61) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Britton v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v The Secretary of State for The Home Department ex parte Abdullah Turgut
• R (Matin) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Z; A v Secretary of State for the Home Department; M v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Krepel
• R (A and Others) v Lord Saville of Newdigate; R (on the application of Widgery Soldiers) v Members of The Tribunal Sitting as The Bloody Sunday Inquiry
• R(Q) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
• R (Saad and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran
• A v Secretary of State
• Anufrijeva v Southwark London Borough Council; R (N) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (M) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Yogathas) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (A and Others) v Lord Saville of Newdigate; R (on the application of Widgery Soldiers) v Members of The Tribunal Sitting as The Bloody Sunday Inquiry