Perry v Perry

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-1

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Viney v Viney

CITES

• Mummery v Mummery
• Weatherley v Weatherley
• Rowell v Rowell

[See more]

• Cramp v Cramp
• Henderson v Henderson
• Blandford v Blandford
• Maslin v Maslin
• Paine v Paine
• Abercrombie v Abercrombie
• Robinson against Gosnold
• Danforth v Danforth, (State of Maine)
• Burk v Burk, (State of West Virginia)
• Timms v Timms
• Struthers v Struthers
• Roberts v Roberts
• Pulford v Pulford
• Statham v Statham
• Beeby v Beeby
• Lane v Lane

APPLIES

• Bartram v Bartram

APPROVES

• Whitney v Whitney

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1 TLR 1633
• [1952] 1 All ER 1076
• [1952] P 203

CONSIDERED in

• Roe v Roe
• Morley v Morley
• W. v W. (No. 2)

[See more]

• Chase v Chase
• Griffith v Griffith
• Rosemary Edith Burrows v Sylvester John Burrows

REFERRED in

• Marczuk v Marczuk
• Howard v Howard
• Irvin v Irvin

[See more]

• Bull v Bull

DISTINGUISHED in

• Howard v Howard
• Ives v Ives
• Pizey v Pizey and Stephenson

APPLIED in

• Harvey v Harvey