Marczuk v Marczuk

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Marczuk v Marczuk

CONSIDERS

• Summary Jurisdiction (Separation and Maintenance) Act 1925 - Articles : S-2
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895 - Articles : S-6
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895 - Articles : S-7

DISTINGUISHES

• Abercombie v Abercombie

REFERS TO

• Robins v National Trust Company
• Statham v Statham
• Herod v Herod

[See more]

• Mummery v Mummery
• Callister v Callister
• Wilson v Glossop
• Colquhoun v Brooks
• Wankie Colliery Company v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Young & Company v Corporation of Leamington
• Turton v Turton
• Hope v Hope
• Curtis v Curtis
• Cooper v Lloyd
• Dent v Dent
• Abson v Abson
• England v England
• Perry v Perry
• Read v Read
• Beeby v Beeby
• Keats v Keats and Montezuma
• Churchman v Churchman
• Leavis v Leavis

APPLIES

• Ruther v Ruther

FOLLOWS

• Henderson v Henderson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1956] 1 All ER 657
• 120 JP 75
• [1956] 2 WLR 849

[See more]

• [1956] P 217