Owners of Cargo on Board The Merak v The Merak(Owners); The Merak

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924 - Articles : SCH-1
• Maharani Woollen Mills Company v Anchor Line

DISTINGUISHES

• T. W. Thomas & Company Ltd v Portsea Steamship Company Ltd

CITES

• Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company Ltd v Adamastos Shipping Company Ltd (Saxon Star.)
• Bruce (W.) Ltd v J. Strong
• Denny, Mott and Dickson, Ltd v Lynn Shipping Company, Ltd

[See more]

• Hamilton & Company v Mackie & Sons
• Lovell & Christmas Ltd v Wall
• RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd v COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION and WIRELESS PUBLICITY, Ltd (by original action) and COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION v RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd, and RADIO PUBLICITY (LONDON)Ltd (by Counterclaim)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1964] 3 All ER 638
• [1964] 2 Lloyd's Rep 283

REFERRED in

• The Phonizien
• Slough Estates Ltd v Slough Borough Council (No. 2)

CITED in

• Brazendale & Company Ltd v Saint Freres S.A. (Inverbank., Tweedbank.)
• Mauritius Oil Refineries Ltd v Stolt Nielsen Nederland BV ('The Stolt Sydness') [QBD (Comm)]
• Dalmia Cement Ltd v National Bank of Pakistan

[See more]

• Owners of the Annefield v Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Annefield (Annefield, The)

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Owners of Cargo on Board The Merak v The Merak(Owners); The Merak

This document cites

• Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company Ltd v Adamastos Shipping Company Ltd (Saxon Star.)
• Bruce (W.) Ltd v J. Strong
• RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd v COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION and WIRELESS PUBLICITY, Ltd (by original action) and COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION v RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd, and RADIO PUBLICITY (LONDON)Ltd (by Counterclaim)
• Hamilton & Company v Mackie & Sons
• Lovell & Christmas Ltd v Wall



See all quotations

• Denny, Mott and Dickson, Ltd v Lynn Shipping Company, Ltd
• T. W. Thomas & Company Ltd v Portsea Steamship Company Ltd
• Maharani Woollen Mills Company v Anchor Line