Owners of Cargo on Board The Merak v The Merak(Owners); The Merak
Linked as:
Extract
Owners of Cargo on Board The Merak v The Merak(Owners); The Merak
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company Ltd v Adamastos Shipping Company Ltd (Saxon Star.)
- Denny, Mott and Dickson, Ltd v Lynn Shipping Company, Ltd
- Lovell & Christmas Ltd v Wall
[See more]
DOES NOT FOLLOW
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
CONSIDERS
- Maharani Woollen Mills Company v Anchor Line
- Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924 - Articles : SCH-1
- Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924
[See more]
DISTINGUISHES
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- The Phonizien
- Maritius Oil Refineries Ltd v Stolt-Nielsen Nederlands B.v (Stolt Sydness)
- Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Mander
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Daval Aciers D'Usinor et de Sacilor v Armare S.r.l. (Nerano)
- Brazendale & Company Ltd v Saint Freres S.A. (Inverbank., Tweedbank.)
- Nordglimt, The (Nordkap)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- The Owners of The ship or vessel "Annefield" (Appellants Defendants) The Owners of the Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Ship or Vessel "annefield" (Respondents Plaintiffs.)
- Rolimpex (Ch. E.) Ltd v Avra Shipping Company Ltd
- Giffen (Electrical Contractors) Ltd Drake & Scull Engineering Ltd and Another Drake & Scull Engineering Ltd
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Astro Valiente Compania Naviera S.A. v Government of Pakistan Ministry of Food and Agriculture (No. 2) (Emmanuel Colocotronis)
- Owners of the Annefield v Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Annefield (Annefield, The)
- Nea Agrex SA v Baltic Shipping Company Ltd
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
NOT APPLIED in
- Caresse Navigation Ltd v Zurich Assurances MAROC; The Channel Ranger
- Herculito Maritime Ltd and Others v Gunvor International BV and Others
COMMENTED in
This document cites
- Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Company Ltd v Adamastos Shipping Company Ltd (Saxon Star.)
- Bruce (W.) Ltd v J. Strong
- RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd v COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION and WIRELESS PUBLICITY, Ltd (by original action) and COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE RADIODIFUSION v RADIO PUBLICITY (UNIVERSAL)Ltd, and RADIO PUBLICITY (LONDON)Ltd (by Counterclaim)
- Hamilton & Company v Mackie & Sons
- Evans v James Webster & Brother Ltd