Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Bourhill v Young
• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Hadley v Baxendale

[See more]

• Hambrook v Stokes Brothers
• Heaven v Pender
• Le Lievre v Gould
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Company
• Woolley v Ministry of Health; Roe v Ministry of Health
• Sharp v Powell
• Smith v London & South Western Railway
• Thurogood v Van Den Berghs & Jurgens Ltd
• Woods v Duncan
• Yorkshire Dale Steamship Company Ltd v Minister of War Transport; The Coxwold

CITES

• Bolton v Stone
• Malleys Ltd v Rogers

ADOPTS

• Summers v Salford Corporation

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1958] 1 Lloyd's Rep 575

APPLIED in

• Slatter v British Railways Board
• Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Company Ltd

REFERRED in

• Hughes v Lord Advocate
• Iron and Steel Holding and Realisation Agency v Compensation Appeal Tribunal
• Chapman v Hearse

[See more]

• Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Company Pty (Wagon Mound) (No. 2)
• Warren v Scruttons Ltd
• Building and Civil Engineering Holidays Scheme Management Ltd v Post Office
• Stewart v West African Terminals Ltd
• Videan v British Transport Commission

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)

CITED in

• Curran v Young

DISTINGUISHED in

• Smith v Leech Brain & Company Ltd
• Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Company Pty (Wagon Mound) (No. 2)

This document cites

• Woolley v Ministry of Health; Roe v Ministry of Health
• Yorkshire Dale Steamship Company Ltd v Minister of War Transport; The Coxwold
• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Bolton v Stone



See all quotations

• Summers v Salford Corporation
• Bourhill v Young
• Woods v Duncan
• Thurogood v Van Den Berghs & Jurgens Ltd
• Sharp v Powell
• Heaven v Pender
• Hadley v Baxendale
• Smith v London & South Western Railway
• Le Lievre v Gould
• Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Company
• Malleys Ltd v Rogers
• Hambrook v Stokes Brothers