Building and Civil Engineering Holidays Scheme Management Ltd v Post Office

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Domine v Grimsdall
• Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)

REFERS TO

• Bainbridge v Postmaster-General
• Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)
• Meux v Great Eastern Railway Company

[See more]

• Triefus & Company Ltd v Post Office
• Chaplin v Hicks
• British Columbia Saw Mill Company v Nettleship
• Coldman v Hill
• Midland Silicones Ltd v Scruttons Ltd
• R v McDonald
• Cory v The Thames Ironworks & Company
• Bavins, Junr. & Sims v London and South Western Bank
• "Gracie" (Owners of the) v "Argentino" (Owners of the). The "Argentino"
• Mouat v Betts Motors Ltd
• Whitfield v Le Despencer

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Building and Civil Engineering Holidays Scheme Management Ltd v Post Office

CONSIDERS

• Crown Proceedings Act 1947 - Articles : S-9
• Post Office Act 1908 - Articles : S-13
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1965] 1 All ER 163
• [1965] 2 WLR 72
• [1966] 1 QB 247

REFERRED in

• American Express Company v British Airways Board

APPLIED in

• R (HM Revenue and Customs) v Machell
• Scragg (Ernest) & Sons Ltd Perseverance Banking and Trust Company Ltd

CITED in

• Moukataff v British Overseas Airways Corpn
• Morris v C. W. Martin & Sons Ltd

FOLLOWED in

• Seino Merchants Singapore Pte Ltd v Porcupine Pte Ltd
• Chua Keng Mong v Hong Realty Pte Ltd and Others

CONSIDERED in

• Morgan v State of Queensland and Others
• R v Hussain
• R v Islam

[See more]

• George W. Bennett Bryson's & Company Ltd trading as Bryson's Shipping v George Purcell trading as Hortico Landscaping and Nursery
• Hulse v Knights Ltd
• George W. Bennett Bryson's & Company Ltd trading as Bryson's Shipping v George Purcell trading as Hortico Landscaping and Nursery

This document cites

---

• Triefus & Company Ltd v Post Office
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Whitfield v Le Despencer
• Chaplin v Hicks
• Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)



See all quotations

• Bavins, Junr. & Sims v London and South Western Bank
• Meux v Great Eastern Railway Company
• Midland Silicones Ltd v Scruttons Ltd
• Cory v The Thames Ironworks & Company
• Bainbridge v Postmaster-General
• Mouat v Betts Motors Ltd
• Coldman v Hill
• Domine v Grimsdall
• "Gracie" (Owners of the) v "Argentino" (Owners of the). The "Argentino"
• R v McDonald
• British Columbia Saw Mill Company v Nettleship
• Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Company Ltd (The Wagon Mound)
• Post Office Act 1908
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947