Nicholas Charles Evans (Claimant/Appellant) v Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators London Borough of Wandsworth (Interested Party/Respondent)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

CITES

• Carter v Cole
• Newcomen v Coulson

FOLLOWS

• Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

AFFIRMS

• Nicholas Charles Evans v Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators The London Borough of Wandsworth (Interested Party)

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Nicholas Charles Evans v Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators The London Borough of Wandsworth (Interested Party)

CONSIDERS

• Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871
• Prescription Act 1832
• Interpretation Act 1978 - Articles : SCH-2

[See more]

• Prescription Act 1832

APPLIED in

• The Heath & Hampstead Society v The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London (acting by The Hampstead Heath, Highgate Wood and Queen's Park Management Committee (and the Projects Sub Committee)) The Environment Agency (Interested Party)

This document cites

• Carter v Cole
• Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons
• Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons
• Nicholas Charles Evans v Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators The London Borough of Wandsworth (Interested Party)
• Newcomen v Coulson



See all quotations

• Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871
• Interpretation Act 1978
• Prescription Act 1832