Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA CASO

• Jordeson v Sutton, Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company
• Jordeson v Sutton, Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company
• Healey v Hawkins

SIGUE

• The Proprietors of the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal Navigation v The Proprietors of the Birmingham Canal Navigations

CITA

• Dalton v Henry Angus & Co; Commissioners of HM Works and Public Buildings v Henry Angus & Co; sub nom Angus & Company v Dalton
• Healey v Hawkins

REFIERE

• Lemaitre v Davis
• Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Others
• R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council

[ver más]

• Rochdale Canal Proprietors v Radcliffe
• Tickle v Brown

CONSIDERA

• Prescription Act 1832 - Artículos : S-II
• Land Registration Act 2002 - Artículos : S-111

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2008] 1 All ER 397
• 17/05/2007 Daily Cases
• [04/06/2007] TLR 2

[ver más]

• [2007] 1 WLR 2543

CONSIDERADA por

• Nicholas Charles Evans (Claimant/Appellant) v Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators London Borough of Wandsworth (Interested Party/Respondent)

RECURSO RESUELTO por

• Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons

Documentos citados

• R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council
• Jordeson v Sutton, Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company
• Lemaitre v Davis
• Healey v Hawkins
• Healey v Hawkins



Ver todas las citas

• Rochdale Canal Proprietors v Radcliffe
• The Proprietors of the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal Navigation v The Proprietors of the Birmingham Canal Navigations
• Jordeson v Sutton, Southcoates and Drypool Gas Company
• Dalton v Henry Angus & Co; Commissioners of HM Works and Public Buildings v Henry Angus & Co; sub nom Angus & Company v Dalton
• Thomas Tapling, - Plaintiff in Error; Hugh Jones, - Defendant in Error
• Tickle v Brown
• Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871
• Prescription Act 1832
• Land Registration Act 2002
• Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Others