Marinos v Marinos

Afectaciones

---

CONSIDERA CASO

• Moore v Moore
• M v M (J) (Children) (Child Abduction)

[ver más]

• R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
• Armstrong v Armstrong
• L-K v K (No 3)

SIGUE

• R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah

APLICA

• C v FC (Brussels II Free-Standing Application for Parental Responsibility)
• Ikimi v Ikimi

CONSIDERADA por

• Olafisoye v Olafisoye (Jurisdiction)
• Olafisoye v Olafisoye
• ZA (R 9. EEA Regs; Abuse of Rights) Afghanistan

[ver más]

• Gorjat v Gorjat
• B (Children)
• S (R) v S (P)
• Munro v Munro

REFERIDA por

• Re T (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Request to Assume Jurisdiction)
• Gisela Pierburg v Jurgen Pierburg
• Re v v "European Maintenance Regulation"

[ver más]

• Z v Z (Divorce: Jurisdiction)
• M v F
• Re M (children) (habitual residence: 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention)
• Re B (A Child) (Habitual Residence: Inherent Jurisdiction)
• M.M. v J.L.
• Nottingham City Council v LM [1] and Others

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• Re T (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Request to Assume Jurisdiction) [Family Division]
• Re L (A Child) (Recognition of Foreign Order)
• Re L (A Child) (Recognition of Foreign Order)

[ver más]

• Re Rapisarda v Colladon; 180 Irregular Divorces

APLICADA por

• P v P (Divorce: Jurisdiction)
• Tan v Choy
• C v S (Divorce : Jurisdiction)

SEGUIDA por

• V v v

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [2007] 2 FLR 1018
• [2008] 2 Fam CR 47

USADA COMO BASE por

• O'K v A

Documentos citados

---

• R. v. Jackpine (R.), (2006) 210 O.A.C. 200 (SCC)
• New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. J.G. and D.V., (1999) 216 N.B.R.(2d) 25 (SCC)
• Ikimi v Ikimi
• M v M (J) (Children) (Child Abduction)
• Armstrong v Armstrong



Ver todas las citas

• L-K v K (Brussels II Revised: Maintenance Pending Suit)
• R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
• R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
• Moore v Moore
• C v FC (Brussels II Free-Standing Application for Parental Responsibility)
• L-K v K (No 3)
• L-K v K (No 2)
• Mark v Mark
• Doris Knoch contra Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.
• Silvana di Paolo v Office national de l'emploi.
• Pedro Magdalena Fernández contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
• Robin Swaddling contra Adjudication Officer.
• Anciens Etablissements D. Angenieux fils aîné and Caisse primaire centrale d'assurance maladie de la région parisienne v Willy Hakenberg.
• Hagen OGH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel.
• Rigsadvokaten v Nicolai Christian Ryborg.
• Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000