Lazard Brothers and Company (Jersey) Ltd v Bois and Bois, Perrier and Labesse

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Royal Bank of Scotland Ltd v Citrusdal Investments Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Dyson v Attorney General
• Wenlock v Moloney

CITES

• Lablanc Ltd v Nahda Invs Ltd [Royal Ct]

APPLIES

• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company
• Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd
• Drummond-Jackson v British Medical Association

FOLLOWS

• Nagle v Feilden
• Cooper v Resch (Formerly Cooper)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] JLR 639

CONSIDERED in

• CMC Holdings Ltd v Martin Henry Forster

CITED in

• Mackinnon v Mackinnon; Mackinnon v Regent Trust Company Ltd

This document cites

• Wenlock v Moloney
• Nagle v Feilden
• Williams and Humbert Ltd v W. & H. Trade Marks (Jersey) Ltd
• Drummond-Jackson v British Medical Association
• Hubbuck & Sons Ltd v Wilkinson, Heywood & Clark Ltd



See all quotations

• South Hetton Coal Company v Hanswell, Shotton and Easington Coal and Coke Company
• Dyson v Attorney General
• Lablanc Ltd v Nahda Invs Ltd [Royal Ct]
• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company
• Cooper v Resch (Formerly Cooper)
• Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd
• Royal Bank of Scotland Ltd v Citrusdal Investments Ltd
• Davey v Bentinck